Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

hp/tq/ and 1/4 with a 76mm/78mm turbo

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • kyleozzie
    replied
    Re: hp/tq/ and 1/4 with a 76mm/78mm turbo

    Originally posted by ThreeHonks View Post
    Also don't come crying when one of those piddly 255 pumps fail and you go lean and your motor leans out.
    I heard three of them are even better lol. Support like 4000 horse or something lol

    Sent from my SCH-I405

    Leave a comment:


  • Superman09
    replied
    Originally posted by ThreeHonks View Post
    Jonny said it himself, a sumped tank and big external is better.

    If you don't have a budget for a nice external setup then that's one thing, but don't kid yourself and think that an internal setup is better than a complete external fuel system.
    Correct, I had a sumped tank and external 4303 for my car. However the cost of this set-up was far greater than a double pumper set-up. Just depends on your goals and budget. For Mike, a Double Pumper is what I would recommend. The cost of sumped/external, its capacity, and it's louder noise are overkill for this project. Double pumper will do the trick just fine

    Leave a comment:


  • ThreeHonks
    replied
    Also don't come crying when one of those piddly 255 pumps fail and you go lean and your motor leans out.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThreeHonks
    replied
    Jonny said it himself, a sumped tank and big external is better.

    If you don't have a budget for a nice external setup then that's one thing, but don't kid yourself and think that an internal setup is better than a complete external fuel system.

    Leave a comment:


  • Formula Z
    replied
    Re: hp/tq/ and 1/4 with a 76mm/78mm turbo

    Twin 255s are a proven method and probably what ill do

    Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

    Leave a comment:


  • Fox Slaughter
    replied
    I was thinking about running a DW300. You have to modify the bucket though?

    Leave a comment:


  • Nocooler
    replied
    Originally posted by 1999Black_Z28 View Post
    Mike, another option I'm looking into is the DW300 (320lph) with the FPWK-017W hotwire kit from Racetronix. This pump is rated at 870 crank hp N/A @ 60psi and 13.5volts. According to my calcs it should put it around 760-780 hp with F/I (depending on your boost) or 650-665rwhp. This is enough for my setup but I don't know what your goals are...

    http://www.deatschwerks.com/resource...fuel-pump-tech

    cons: You need to modify your stock bucket
    pros: No worries about a pump failure causing you to go lean, no hobbs switch, can be done for around $230

    If you are planning on 650+ rwhp I would suggest the Lonnies Double Pumper as others have suggested.
    Dave - the turbobuick guys like the deatschwerks pumps. They've also been using the Denso supra tt pump, and the intank bosch 044.

    To bad the zl1 fuel bucket wouldn't fit

    Leave a comment:


  • 1999Black_Z28
    replied
    Mike, another option I'm looking into is the DW300 (320lph) with the FPWK-017W hotwire kit from Racetronix. This pump is rated at 870 crank hp N/A @ 60psi and 13.5volts. According to my calcs it should put it around 760-780 hp with F/I (depending on your boost) or 650-665rwhp. This is enough for my setup but I don't know what your goals are...

    http://www.deatschwerks.com/resource...fuel-pump-tech

    cons: You need to modify your stock bucket
    pros: No worries about a pump failure causing you to go lean, no hobbs switch, can be done for around $230

    If you are planning on 650+ rwhp I would suggest the Lonnies Double Pumper as others have suggested.

    Leave a comment:


  • DETROITMUSCLE
    replied
    Originally posted by ThreeHonks View Post
    Go with an external pump and sump the tank. Not a fan of dual in intake pumps at all- kinda look at it as the "hack" method
    How are they any different than your twin pumps, all twin setups have the same cons but I don't find them as being a "hack" job, everybody works on a different budget.

    Leave a comment:


  • Superman09
    replied
    Originally posted by ThreeHonks View Post
    Go with an external pump and sump the tank. Not a fan of dual in intake pumps at all- kinda look at it as the "hack" method
    I disagree. Twin pumps when done right by a reputable company has shown terrific results with great manners and longevity.

    Sure a sumped tank with an external pump might be "Better" but when you consider the cost of that vs twin in tanks and also how silent twin in tanks are compared to an external, I would do dual in tanks for a street car under 900 rwhp all day everyday and twice on sundays

    Leave a comment:


  • ThreeHonks
    replied
    Go with an external pump and sump the tank. Not a fan of dual in intake pumps at all- kinda look at it as the "hack" method

    Leave a comment:


  • Speedfreak391
    replied
    Good to know! Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • DETROITMUSCLE
    replied
    twin 255s should support 800+ on pump gas just fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Speedfreak391
    replied
    I looked at running a single Aeromotive 340. But went with twin 255's in the tank. I hope they will give me enough fuel for my needs. I think 650ish at the wheels isn't to far out of line?

    Leave a comment:


  • Superman09
    replied
    A pair of 255's in tank would be the way to go! I am direct with Nasty who gets them done through Lonnies. If you decide to go that route let me know and I can get you good pricing on it!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X