Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Boost or Spray

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by 1BADAIR View Post
    p1 would be plenty for a stock bottom 5.3
    P1 is always overlooked and I don't understand why....P1 is plenty capable for any stock bottom end IMHO.
    sigpic
    Turbo Charged LS1/T56

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by 1BADAIR View Post
      p1 would be plenty for a stock bottom 5.3
      Originally posted by WMCCjames View Post
      P1 is always overlooked and I don't understand why....P1 is plenty capable for any stock bottom end IMHO.

      agreed.. its plenty fine for a stock motor and can easily add a good amount of power




      Comment


      • #78
        Id go either way, right now, its all in the price.
        1999 Camaro - 6 liters of fury.....

        Comment


        • #79
          you seem to be leaning towards boost but i may add for the nitrous aspect if you go that way. make sure you have all the saftey equipment and its installed correctly. the bottle heater wiring is done right and to make sure it cuts off when the car cuts off as a back up incase you bump the switch or forget to shut it down. and if nothing else make SURE you have a blowdown tube. i know this picture is as old as the internet but i like to post it when people are looking into nitrous as a reminder its not something to cut corners with. dunno the exact details but this is a t/a after a bottle went boom inside the car.
          Attached Files
          wishing i could drive like joe and the atm squad

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Lucky SOB View Post
            Doesn't fit the "status" criteria in my mind at least. People always get disappointed when you say "yeah it's a rear mount"... it's just "not as cool" - and don't lie, part of getting a turbo(s) is to show off
            But having a rear mount is sweet because to the untrained eye you don't have a turbo. So you're a sleeper. Plus rear mounts keep down temps. Low temps, translates to more power.
            Originally posted by Yoshi94
            Mines about an inch bigger than Kyles. I need to get one of those
            Originally posted by ryanwarby01
            Put it this way, if you have a money tree a LT1 is a wood chipper!
            sigpic

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Fox Slaughter View Post
              But having a rear mount is sweet because to the untrained eye you don't have a turbo. So you're a sleeper. Plus rear mounts keep down temps. Low temps, translates to more power.
              lol until you pull on them and bam its right there clear as day. and sts kits dont go unheard, mannn i want one
              wishing i could drive like joe and the atm squad

              Comment


              • #82
                Thats the point. Sleeper till you see them in your mirrors. Thats why cut outs are sweet. Nah I got a 6 banger till you cut them open and just hear a heavy breathing LTX/LSX then the Civic next to you shits bricks.
                Originally posted by Yoshi94
                Mines about an inch bigger than Kyles. I need to get one of those
                Originally posted by ryanwarby01
                Put it this way, if you have a money tree a LT1 is a wood chipper!
                sigpic

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Fox Slaughter View Post
                  But having a rear mount is sweet because to the untrained eye you don't have a turbo. So you're a sleeper. Plus rear mounts keep down temps. Low temps, translates to more power.
                  Pretty sure just about anyone that is going to be racing will be able to spot the rear mount turbo before hand. Turbos are more efficient when warm over being too cold

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Rear-mount assy. is pretty obvious looking at the rear of the car isn't it?

                    Front mounts spool a lot quicker, and the whole cutout thing doesn't exactly work if you're cammed. I know my catback is pretty quiet but it's still obvious.

                    Used to own a Firebird.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by Fbomb View Post
                      Rear-mount assy. is pretty obvious looking at the rear of the car isn't it?

                      Front mounts spool a lot quicker, and the whole cutout thing doesn't exactly work if you're cammed. I know my catback is pretty quiet but it's still obvious.
                      Yes, a front mount is going to spool slightly faster, but not enough to notice really. And an STS is definitely noticeable from the rear of a Camaro. I think there was a guy on here that actually cut out the bottom of the trunk and mounted the turbo up there. Looked like a slick setup, but I can't remember for the life of me what his username was. Seems like it was a Polo Green LT1 T/A

                      2011 Mustang GT
                      20" Satin Black AMRs with 305/35 & 275/35 MT Street Radials, Saleen Grille, CS Lower Valance, Roush Axleback, GT500 Spoiler, resonator delete

                      In Progress: Brembo 6-piston brake upgrade


                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by my95z28 View Post
                        Seems like it was a Polo Green LT1 T/A
                        I remember that car, was a Polo Green LT1 Camaro I think. Was still very visible from pictures that were posted.

                        Used to own a Firebird.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Oh yea, I won't argue that an STS won't be visible, I just think that might be what I would do to tuck it up some more. It would be hard to wrap my head around cutting up the bottom of the car though.

                          2011 Mustang GT
                          20" Satin Black AMRs with 305/35 & 275/35 MT Street Radials, Saleen Grille, CS Lower Valance, Roush Axleback, GT500 Spoiler, resonator delete

                          In Progress: Brembo 6-piston brake upgrade


                          Comment


                          • #88
                            lol you could hide it with the ugliest body kit you can find and a HUGE valance.

                            Used to own a Firebird.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              A rear mount turbo would definitely make more noise, I would think.
                              Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

                              "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                my sts turbo with long tube headers was fully spooled at 2800rpms. it was real loud, but yes, very visible from the rear. not much of a sleeper unless you look under the hood. but then you see the blow off valve.
                                98 z28, m6, monster clutch, eibach pro kit, custom twin turbo setup, 317 heads, z06 valve springs, arp rod bolts, 512rwhp at 10lbs. cobra eater

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X