Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

o2 problem (EFI Connection conversion)

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • o2 problem (EFI Connection conversion)

    K guys & girls I have an issue and I'm baffled and I need some help.

    As some of you know I did the EFI conversion to my car and got rid of the Opti.
    Well we went back to the Dyno last week Thursday and there was no change in HP levels

    One thing that stayed the same was the o2's
    They split like a bad divorce!
    At idle they hang right in there, nice and even at a slight throttle but if you start asking for more or go WOT the split BAD!
    One is really rich and the other is really lean

    We hooked up a wide Band on both sides and it was real close to were we know the o2's are wrong.
    We even put a different PCM on the car, same thing.
    I check my wiring 3 times today and they buzz out just fine and in the right spot.

    I have also swapped o2's with new ones with no change.

    So what is my freaking issue?
    Help me out if you know or have an idea.
    Last edited by Phantom409; April 26th, 2010, 10:27 PM.



    VicePresident of West Michigan Firebird Club
    A.K.A The Maverick
    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/660128/1
    93 TA Currently Under Construction AGAIN
    2007 2500 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab w/ 6.0L & 3.73's

  • #2
    The HP problem we believe could be springs.
    Car quit making PWR at 3500 RPM and kind of leveled out and picked up again.



    VicePresident of West Michigan Firebird Club
    A.K.A The Maverick
    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/660128/1
    93 TA Currently Under Construction AGAIN
    2007 2500 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab w/ 6.0L & 3.73's

    Comment


    • #3
      The car needs to be tuned with a MAF and in open loop. I have run into this same situation before, however the car was running fine. I kept throwing a code becasue the O2's were switching between lean and rich too quickly. I also had brand new AC Delco sensors.

      Bottom line: Quit wasting your time with them, run open loop. Throw in a MAF on there too

      Comment


      • #4
        I do have a MAF now



        VicePresident of West Michigan Firebird Club
        A.K.A The Maverick
        http://www.cardomain.com/ride/660128/1
        93 TA Currently Under Construction AGAIN
        2007 2500 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab w/ 6.0L & 3.73's

        Comment


        • #5
          From what I have dug up today I have 2 optios:

          1. redo the harness
          2. Buy Wideband o2's (supposed to work better???)

          Not going to just throw money at it so well figure it out!

          Any one know anything about Wideband o2's and why they are better?????



          VicePresident of West Michigan Firebird Club
          A.K.A The Maverick
          http://www.cardomain.com/ride/660128/1
          93 TA Currently Under Construction AGAIN
          2007 2500 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab w/ 6.0L & 3.73's

          Comment


          • #6
            why are you against just tuning them out?

            Comment


            • #7
              why would you want to tune them out on such a mild combanation? Its a good tool to let the computer monitor the Air/fuel events after the fact of combustion. JMHO, but I think he should take advantage of every LS1 advantage he can. And we figured out what was wrong with the O2 readings, he is building new, 1 piece O2 harness tomorrow. But....................I think Kyle has other plans in the works now.........................."cough" 6 liter "cough". Oh, shoot, did I say that......................................nevermin d, no, I didnt say that. Wait, yes I did, sorry Kyle, BWAHAAAAAAAAAAAA. Thats all, ive done enough damage here, lol, im out. Eric L

              1997 Camaro SS #2819 M6, Red, 3.42, 1 of 27, Ttops, BBK shorty headers, Flowmaster cat back, 1.6 rr, LT4 valve springs, ASAM CAI, Centerforce clutch, runs 12s, breaks 10 bolts.
              http://s602.photobucket.com/albums/t...20Camaro%20SS/


              1963 Plymouth Valiant Signet 200, 6.0 LS3, Carb, Rapid Motorsports Dominator 2X cam.
              http://s602.photobucket.com/albums/t...uth%20Valiant/

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by prorac1 View Post
                he is building new, 1 piece O2 harness tomorrow.
                kyle told me last night that the wiring was fine. Is this being taken seriously or this just a guess-the-problem game show?
                -Joel
                1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
                1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd


                WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JoeliusZ28 View Post
                  kyle told me last night that the wiring was fine. Is this being taken seriously or this just a guess-the-problem game show?
                  It buzzed out fine Joel but I had to use some butt connectors to make them longer to reach my o2's and I believe that they are causing my data transfer at high rates.
                  A mistake maybe on my part!



                  VicePresident of West Michigan Firebird Club
                  A.K.A The Maverick
                  http://www.cardomain.com/ride/660128/1
                  93 TA Currently Under Construction AGAIN
                  2007 2500 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab w/ 6.0L & 3.73's

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    And as far as the 6.0...................money is an issue at this point but I have a hook up if I decide to go that route

                    If I do, well you'll have to wait but by then tail lights are all you will see



                    VicePresident of West Michigan Firebird Club
                    A.K.A The Maverick
                    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/660128/1
                    93 TA Currently Under Construction AGAIN
                    2007 2500 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab w/ 6.0L & 3.73's

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      uh on DR LT1 going lsx
                      Doing less with more


                      Comment


                      • #12
                        buzzed out?

                        what are the ohm readings.
                        any exhaust leaks? ANY? minor missfire will cause this too

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I checked it myself Larry. No exhaust leaks what so ever. He put butt connectors in the O2 extensions, and I dont think they are transfering the hi res and lo res signal correctally. And IMHO hes beter off building 1 piece harnesses just to eliminate the connectors. However, I did not ohm the wires, Kyle might have though. Eric L

                          1997 Camaro SS #2819 M6, Red, 3.42, 1 of 27, Ttops, BBK shorty headers, Flowmaster cat back, 1.6 rr, LT4 valve springs, ASAM CAI, Centerforce clutch, runs 12s, breaks 10 bolts.
                          http://s602.photobucket.com/albums/t...20Camaro%20SS/


                          1963 Plymouth Valiant Signet 200, 6.0 LS3, Carb, Rapid Motorsports Dominator 2X cam.
                          http://s602.photobucket.com/albums/t...uth%20Valiant/

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            It's getting proper voltage 12v and the high and low res are reading 5v for reference.
                            I checked all my wires with my voltage gauge and they went to the proper spot but that was just insurance on my part.
                            Car has no exhaust leaks.

                            My worry is that the connectors that I used to make the o2 harness longer cant transfer the signal from the o2 fast enough at high speeds so the PCM don't know what the heck it's seeing.



                            VicePresident of West Michigan Firebird Club
                            A.K.A The Maverick
                            http://www.cardomain.com/ride/660128/1
                            93 TA Currently Under Construction AGAIN
                            2007 2500 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab w/ 6.0L & 3.73's

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              What hes asking Kyle is ohm the transfer wires and tell him what they ohm. Data transfer is all based on resistance in the wire IIRC. I would re wire them just to avoid a problem in the future with corrosion within the butt connector. Eric L

                              1997 Camaro SS #2819 M6, Red, 3.42, 1 of 27, Ttops, BBK shorty headers, Flowmaster cat back, 1.6 rr, LT4 valve springs, ASAM CAI, Centerforce clutch, runs 12s, breaks 10 bolts.
                              http://s602.photobucket.com/albums/t...20Camaro%20SS/


                              1963 Plymouth Valiant Signet 200, 6.0 LS3, Carb, Rapid Motorsports Dominator 2X cam.
                              http://s602.photobucket.com/albums/t...uth%20Valiant/

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X