Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

01SS - Restored Project underway!

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • place is a dump!!!




    Comment


    • no hostility I didn't mean to demean Ryan's motor at all, just giving insight to the magnitude of your motor Brent. Just because its n/a doesn't mean it won't need major fuel.
      Doing less with more


      Comment


      • aeromotive 340 should be enough

        Flow at 60psi is 465 lbs./hr @ 13.5 V (Using 6.2 lbs per gallon)
        465 lbs/hr / .5 NA BSFC = 930 Crank Shaft HP
        Remember this pump flow and not a system (i.e. lines and rails). In order to get the most out of this pump it would require fuel system upgrades (lines, rails, pump wiring and reg).

        Comment


        • Originally posted by DETROITMUSCLE View Post
          no hostility I didn't mean to demean Ryan's motor at all, just giving insight to the magnitude of your motor Brent. Just because its n/a doesn't mean it won't need major fuel.
          no one is arguing that its not gonna need major fuel! that thing is gonna be a monster! But there is a huge difference between fueling an FI engine or n/a. n/a is n/a, it doesnt matter if you are making 300hp or 900, it just doesnt require as much fuel.

          and i really appreciate everything else, jeff... im sure you didnt
          Last edited by ThreeHonks; April 16th, 2011, 05:57 PM.

          Comment


          • a 1000hp boosted engine requires about the same fuel as a 1300-1400 HP NA engine

            Comment


            • thank you larry! maybe jeff will acknowledge what I am saying now that you said it and it didnt come from my username

              Comment


              • Where's the fire hose?
                sigpic
                o·vr·kill [oh-ver-kil]1. an excess of what is required or suitable, as because of zeal or misjudgment.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ThreeHonks View Post
                  thank you larry! maybe jeff will acknowledge what I am saying now that you said it and it didnt come from my username
                  Where did I say I didn't believe you? I was merely talking about his motor, not referencing any boosted cars as that is something I don't know much about. Stop whining and acting like I'm out to poke fun at you I could care ****ing less. Guess thats why I complimented your car in other threads.
                  Doing less with more


                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by 1BADAIR View Post
                    aeromotive 340 should be enough

                    Flow at 60psi is 465 lbs./hr @ 13.5 V (Using 6.2 lbs per gallon)
                    465 lbs/hr / .5 NA BSFC = 930 Crank Shaft HP
                    Remember this pump flow and not a system (i.e. lines and rails). In order to get the most out of this pump it would require fuel system upgrades (lines, rails, pump wiring and reg).
                    Racetronix tried to convince me that pump wouldn't support past 700rwhp comfortably.
                    Doing less with more


                    Comment


                    • Psssh, need to have a motor before you can need fuel....
                      2000 Trans Am l 1967 Firebird

                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by 1BADAIR View Post
                        aeromotive 340 should be enough

                        Flow at 60psi is 465 lbs./hr @ 13.5 V (Using 6.2 lbs per gallon)
                        465 lbs/hr / .5 NA BSFC = 930 Crank Shaft HP
                        Remember this pump flow and not a system (i.e. lines and rails). In order to get the most out of this pump it would require fuel system upgrades (lines, rails, pump wiring and reg).
                        Read the exact same thing on Tech from Aero. Coming directly from them, I have a little more confidence. Going to call them this week to clear a few things up.
                        sigpic
                        o·vr·kill [oh-ver-kil]1. an excess of what is required or suitable, as because of zeal or misjudgment.

                        Comment


                        • sigpic
                          U.S. Army 1983-2005
                          11.20@122.37 1.51 60'

                          Originally posted by WMCCjames

                          "Plans Subject to change upon Sobering up"

                          Comment


                          • Front rubber came in today!



                            After looking at the painted 'steins for the last week or so, figured they could use one more little detail . Seriously, reeeeally need to get the "big parts" back...this spare time is killing me!



                            sigpic
                            o·vr·kill [oh-ver-kil]1. an excess of what is required or suitable, as because of zeal or misjudgment.

                            Comment


                            • Ordered clutch today too

                              sigpic
                              o·vr·kill [oh-ver-kil]1. an excess of what is required or suitable, as because of zeal or misjudgment.

                              Comment


                              • where did you get those Bilstein stickers?

                                1996 Camaro Z28 cam, heads, stall, and a few other goodies
                                Alumni Member, MSU Racing Club
                                THREE-PEAT MiFbody Meet & Greet "Longest Hauler Award" 2010, 2011, 2012
                                Originally posted by JasonH
                                It's amazing what you can get done when you throw copious amounts of money at something.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X