Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Project: PBR-Built Z/28

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I can find one or scan the info, if I can find it.

    Ideally, the pinion angle should match the transmission output shaft angle. This is supposed to counteract any forces on the driveshaft

    1998 Camaro Z28 - Bright Red, 6.0 TR224, 4l60e, 3.42 Eaton TrueTrac
    1989 Camaro IROC-Z Convertible - 355 big tube TPI, WC T5, 3.42 Zexel Torsen, CTS-V/C4 brakes
    1955 Bel Air 2 Door Post - 357 TPI, Muncie M20, 4 wheel disc

    2006 Saab 9-7x 5.3i Daily Driver

    Comment


    • Originally posted by hoogiesngrinderz View Post
      I can find one or scan the info, if I can find it.

      Ideally, the pinion angle should match the transmission output shaft angle. This is supposed to counteract any forces on the driveshaft
      Gotcha, thanks for putting that in layman's terms, that makes sense to me. I'll take a look at it tomorrow and see where its at.
      -Joel
      1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
      1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd


      WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop

      Comment


      • IIRC UMI gives the same instructions as BMR.

        http://www.bmrsuspension.com/siteart/install/TA001.pdf

        Some people will argue against this method, but it's a starting point if nothing else.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by hoogiesngrinderz View Post
          I can find one or scan the info, if I can find it.

          Ideally, the pinion angle should match the transmission output shaft angle. This is supposed to counteract any forces on the driveshaft
          What he said

          Comment


          • Originally posted by birdie2000 View Post
            IIRC UMI gives the same instructions as BMR.

            http://www.bmrsuspension.com/siteart/install/TA001.pdf

            Some people will argue against this method, but it's a starting point if nothing else.
            Based on that I'd have to agree with what Michael recommended above. Good stuff. I'm thinking this isn't that critical if its slightly off. Heck, my rear axle was twisting around in stretched torque arm bolt holes for a while earlier this season ... then again, that did kill the u-joint.
            -Joel
            1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
            1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd


            WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop

            Comment


            • I personally like to measure the pinion angle. Not the driveline angle. The angle of the driveshaft does nothing for me. I like to set the pinion angle to a -1.5 to -2 degrees. Meaning the diff should be pointing 1.5 o 2 degrees towards the ground not the sky. This is how MADMAN does it and its worked great for me.


              Comment


              • Here's more info to further complicate the issue, and the reason why some people like to measure the trans-output shaft.

                http://www.markwilliams.com/driveshafttech.aspx

                Comment


                • Originally posted by c0ncEpT View Post
                  I personally like to measure the pinion angle. Not the driveline angle. The angle of the driveshaft does nothing for me. I like to set the pinion angle to a -1.5 to -2 degrees. Meaning the diff should be pointing 1.5 o 2 degrees towards the ground not the sky. This is how MADMAN does it and its worked great for me.
                  Depends on the car. I think we had this discussion before.

                  But overall, this isn't a bad way to go about setting driveline angles. There are so many variables that it differs from vehicle to vehicle

                  1998 Camaro Z28 - Bright Red, 6.0 TR224, 4l60e, 3.42 Eaton TrueTrac
                  1989 Camaro IROC-Z Convertible - 355 big tube TPI, WC T5, 3.42 Zexel Torsen, CTS-V/C4 brakes
                  1955 Bel Air 2 Door Post - 357 TPI, Muncie M20, 4 wheel disc

                  2006 Saab 9-7x 5.3i Daily Driver

                  Comment


                  • So per the madman method I would already be in spec. I could always use both methods and meet in the middle.
                    -Joel
                    1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
                    1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd


                    WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop

                    Comment


                    • Yes. His method works. We accidently set Jeffs pinion angle to +2 once. The car wouldnt get out of its own way. Set it back to -2 and it went 1.45 60' next time out yanking both wheels.


                      Comment


                      • my car wont move if i measure off the driveshaft. pinion to subframe connectors is how i do it

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by c0ncEpT View Post
                          Yes. His method works. We accidently set Jeffs pinion angle to +2 once. The car wouldnt get out of its own way. Set it back to -2 and it went 1.45 60' next time out yanking both wheels.
                          Originally posted by 1BADAIR View Post
                          my car wont move if i measure off the driveshaft. pinion to subframe connectors is how i do it
                          incredible that a couple degrees angle in a u-joint eats up that much energy
                          -Joel
                          1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
                          1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd


                          WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by JoeliusZ28 View Post
                            incredible that a couple degrees angle in a u-joint eats up that much energy
                            I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong, but angle helps with planting the rear....right?

                            Pinion down 2* with a DS up ~2* = 4*
                            Pinion up 2* with a DS up ~2* = 0*
                            Then add in the torsional forces...

                            Meh..I'm going to have to measure the 98 (all stock, stock height) vs my 89 (lowered, pinion 1* down, DS 1.5* up?). I'm tired

                            1998 Camaro Z28 - Bright Red, 6.0 TR224, 4l60e, 3.42 Eaton TrueTrac
                            1989 Camaro IROC-Z Convertible - 355 big tube TPI, WC T5, 3.42 Zexel Torsen, CTS-V/C4 brakes
                            1955 Bel Air 2 Door Post - 357 TPI, Muncie M20, 4 wheel disc

                            2006 Saab 9-7x 5.3i Daily Driver

                            Comment


                            • does it? Seems like the same forces would be applied to the torque arm and control arms regardless of pinion angle... Is there something im missing?
                              -Joel
                              1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
                              1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd


                              WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop

                              Comment


                              • Depends on the purpose of the car. Drag, auto-x, street, and so on. Stock torque arms will allow flex, stock LCA bushings will cause flex, power levels will create different body flex.

                                The angles will cause changes on where/how the forces are applied.

                                1998 Camaro Z28 - Bright Red, 6.0 TR224, 4l60e, 3.42 Eaton TrueTrac
                                1989 Camaro IROC-Z Convertible - 355 big tube TPI, WC T5, 3.42 Zexel Torsen, CTS-V/C4 brakes
                                1955 Bel Air 2 Door Post - 357 TPI, Muncie M20, 4 wheel disc

                                2006 Saab 9-7x 5.3i Daily Driver

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X