Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Camaro Front end Exposed.

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    What does then?

    T-tops aren't coming back.

    That means you're left with two choices: Hardtop, convertible.

    Therefore, a hardtop with a sunroof is just fine.
    Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

    "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by pacefabricating View Post
      Humm, it still lookis like the charger type in back and sits high,, I like it cause they came back out, but i would deffenently lower it as soon as i got one in the driveway, and do some other mods also.......
      Yeah but what stock vehicle doesn't sit high?
      - Brian Meissen
      Owner, MiFBody.com
      Administrator, LTxTech.com


      1994 Camaro LT1 Transplant - 357ci LT1, cammed, stalled, and driven.
      2022 Camaro LT1 - "Cherry Bomb 2"
      Michigan FBody Meet & Greet Car Show 2022
      June 4th, 2022 - 9am to 3pm!!!
      The HUB Stadium, Auburn Hills, MI

      Comment


      • #48
        I like it but then again ive always liked it

        Comment


        • #49
          And yeah, the headlights were being hidden by the bras because the headlights aren't finished. So don't get bent out about the headlights.
          - Brian Meissen
          Owner, MiFBody.com
          Administrator, LTxTech.com


          1994 Camaro LT1 Transplant - 357ci LT1, cammed, stalled, and driven.
          2022 Camaro LT1 - "Cherry Bomb 2"
          Michigan FBody Meet & Greet Car Show 2022
          June 4th, 2022 - 9am to 3pm!!!
          The HUB Stadium, Auburn Hills, MI

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by MP81 View Post
            What does then?

            T-tops aren't coming back.

            That means you're left with two choices: Hardtop, convertible.

            Therefore, a hardtop with a sunroof is just fine.
            I have to agree with this. As much as I'd love a t-top option, I'm not going to let that deter me from buying the car. I'll get the sunroof so I can open 'er up. ...hmm, or maybe buy a hard top and then cut the top to create a t-top.
            - Brian Meissen
            Owner, MiFBody.com
            Administrator, LTxTech.com


            1994 Camaro LT1 Transplant - 357ci LT1, cammed, stalled, and driven.
            2022 Camaro LT1 - "Cherry Bomb 2"
            Michigan FBody Meet & Greet Car Show 2022
            June 4th, 2022 - 9am to 3pm!!!
            The HUB Stadium, Auburn Hills, MI

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by meissen View Post
              I have to agree with this. As much as I'd love a t-top option, I'm not going to let that deter me from buying the car. I'll get the sunroof so I can open 'er up. ...hmm, or maybe buy a hard top and then cut the top to create a t-top.
              you would chop up a new car

              Comment


              • #52
                Who cares? It's a car people, c'mon now. People chop up 4th gens to convert their hard tops into T-tops -- granted it's got the structure for it, but it can't be THAT much harder to do. Definitely not saying it'd be 100% safe... lol

                At that, it'd be freaking awesome, really.. if they had gotten far enough into planning for t-tops that they left the structure for t-tops under the sheet metal. I know Jeff said it's not there, but hypothetically... that'd be awesome. Laws prevent GM from actually having factory t-top cars, but if people wanted them bad enough they'd be able to make it themselves, hahaha that's one way to get what you want. GM gives you the underpinnings, you just gotta be the one to do the "unlawful" mod.
                Last edited by meissen; January 12th, 2008, 12:49 AM.
                - Brian Meissen
                Owner, MiFBody.com
                Administrator, LTxTech.com


                1994 Camaro LT1 Transplant - 357ci LT1, cammed, stalled, and driven.
                2022 Camaro LT1 - "Cherry Bomb 2"
                Michigan FBody Meet & Greet Car Show 2022
                June 4th, 2022 - 9am to 3pm!!!
                The HUB Stadium, Auburn Hills, MI

                Comment


                • #53
                  maybe Im a moron, but seriously how can a convertable be more "crash test safe" than a TTOP car. Last I checked SOMETHING over a persons head is a bit more than nothing.. if they say no ttops because of crash tests thats bull IMO
                  -Derek-
                  1999 Pontiac Trans Am Ram Air- Lots of Boltons..

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by MP81 View Post
                    Not performance wise.

                    I really, REALLY hope GM prices a Z28 at 25k.
                    Not likely . . . a new Z28 was more than that fifteen years ago.

                    I'll bet that Challenger and Camaro will end up pretty close in price, if you compare v6s, base v8s, and high-line v8s side by side.
                    sigpic

                    Stock 1998 T/A, original owner


                    17 years and 18,664 miles . . . still lovin' it

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      personally i dislike t tops so i like the moon roof idea




                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by GETGONE View Post
                        How is it a fail? Blame the government and all the idiot proofing they have to do to keep everyone safe from themselves for the death of T tops. Moonroofs are the solid steel panels that recess back into the roof. A sunroof has glass.
                        i never said i was blaming GM. You better believe im blaming NHTSA.

                        Originally posted by lozanoa11 View Post
                        sun roofs do not belong on camaros sorry. it just dosent feel right.
                        agreed. sun roofs are for the birds. (and i dont mean firebirds)

                        Originally posted by MP81 View Post
                        Therefore, a hardtop with a sunroof is just fine.
                        no.

                        Originally posted by meissen View Post
                        Yeah but what stock vehicle doesn't sit high?
                        high ride heights, and high door lines brought to you in part by... oh yea! NHTSA again!

                        Originally posted by meissen View Post
                        Who cares? It's a car people, c'mon now. People chop up 4th gens to convert their hard tops into T-tops -- granted it's got the structure for it, but it can't be THAT much harder to do. Definitely not saying it'd be 100% safe... lol

                        At that, it'd be freaking awesome, really.. if they had gotten far enough into planning for t-tops that they left the structure for t-tops under the sheet metal. I know Jeff said it's not there, but hypothetically... that'd be awesome. Laws prevent GM from actually having factory t-top cars, but if people wanted them bad enough they'd be able to make it themselves, hahaha that's one way to get what you want. GM gives you the underpinnings, you just gotta be the one to do the "unlawful" mod.
                        Two points brian:

                        1) T-top parts for a 5th gen wont be readily availible like they are for a 4th. A t-top conversion, while admittedly possible, is going to take a LOT of money. The entire piece will need to be custom fabricated, and that could easily add up to $3000 by the time youre done. its doable at best.

                        2) I agree about cutting one up. When i first saw the camaro was going to have b-pillars (and i assumed this was because of t-tops) I thought to myself... well gee it cant be that much work to take a sawzall to a b-pillar and add some custom glass! Since I first saw this concept I have been envisioning a hardtop, OPEN WINDOW car in my garage some day. I dont know what it is but i just love when a rear quarter window disappears as its rolled down. At this point, GM is going to produce neither that, NOR a t-top model... all because of my good buddies over at NHSTA. remind me to send them a thank you letter.

                        Originally posted by redfbirdv6 View Post
                        maybe Im a moron, but seriously how can a convertable be more "crash test safe" than a TTOP car. Last I checked SOMETHING over a persons head is a bit more than nothing.. if they say no ttops because of crash tests thats bull IMO
                        youre not a moron, you've hit the nail on the head. NHSTA ****s up everything

                        We can also thank NHSTA for the added height to the car (that we've always known was goign to happen), as well as the cars *current* behemoth weight of 4000-4200 pounds.

                        CAFE and NHSTA are fantastic organizations if you support the deterioration of free market and civil liberties These organizations only move in one direction, so be ready to kiss your convertible goodbye in the future too. NHSTA was founded to protect the consumer from stupidly dangerous designs, something that is necessary but taken too far. "stupidly dangerous" would be a design on a car that actually CAUSES injury , instead of a car that merely fails to keep its occupants safe in accidental conditions. Obviously, theyve been doing a little more than that for quite some time now.

                        now that im done ranting... I applaud GM for still managing to produce an awesome looking car while having to deal with all this BS. This definitely wont stop me from buying the car, but it does further fuel my hatred for an organization that is messing with my dream car.
                        Last edited by JoeliusZ28; January 12th, 2008, 03:32 AM.
                        -Joel
                        1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
                        1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd


                        WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Hey, as long as they don't bring back those goofy half and half sunroofs from the late 70's early 80's I'm good.
                          Last edited by WMCCjames; January 12th, 2008, 08:29 AM.
                          sigpic
                          Turbo Charged LS1/T56

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by JoeliusZ28 View Post
                            CAFE and NHSTA are fantastic organizations if you support the deterioration of free market and civil liberties These organizations only move in one direction, so be ready to kiss your convertible goodbye in the future too.
                            That already happened. You're too young to remember. Ever notice there's no factory verts from 1977 to about 1985. They were deemed unsafe and the only verts available were from 3rd party conversions. Demand from the market helped bring them back.

                            _____________________________________________
                            Wade
                            2002 Camaro SS T Top Black M6 SLP 345HP
                            1985 Camaro IROC Z28 T Top Silver 305TPI Auto
                            2003 S10 Blazer 2 door 2wd 4.3 auto lowered 3" daily driver

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by WMCCjames View Post
                              Hey, as long as they don't bring back those goofy half and half sunroffs from the late 70's early 80's I'm good.
                              You mean the "His N Hers" sunroofs? I don't think those were ever a factory option though.

                              _____________________________________________
                              Wade
                              2002 Camaro SS T Top Black M6 SLP 345HP
                              1985 Camaro IROC Z28 T Top Silver 305TPI Auto
                              2003 S10 Blazer 2 door 2wd 4.3 auto lowered 3" daily driver

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by JoeliusZ28 View Post
                                Two points brian:

                                1) T-top parts for a 5th gen wont be readily availible like they are for a 4th. A t-top conversion, while admittedly possible, is going to take a LOT of money. The entire piece will need to be custom fabricated, and that could easily add up to $3000 by the time youre done. its doable at best..
                                Probably more than that unless a major player like ASC decides the business case makes sense and makes a 5th gen T-top conversion kit.

                                Originally posted by JoeliusZ28 View Post
                                youre not a moron, you've hit the nail on the head. NHSTA ****s up everything

                                We can also thank NHSTA for the added height to the car (that we've always known was goign to happen), as well as the cars *current* behemoth weight of 4000-4200 pounds.

                                CAFE and NHSTA are fantastic organizations if you support the deterioration of free market and civil liberties These organizations only move in one direction, so be ready to kiss your convertible goodbye in the future too. NHSTA was founded to protect the consumer from stupidly dangerous designs, something that is necessary but taken too far. "stupidly dangerous" would be a design on a car that actually CAUSES injury , instead of a car that merely fails to keep its occupants safe in accidental conditions. Obviously, theyve been doing a little more than that for quite some time now.

                                now that im done ranting... I applaud GM for still managing to produce an awesome looking car while having to deal with all this BS. This definitely wont stop me from buying the car, but it does further fuel my hatred for an organization that is messing with my dream car.
                                To pile on to Joel's rant, 95% NHSTA's job is to protect stupid people.

                                People who don't wear seat belts.

                                People who put their child seats in the front passenger seat instead of the rear.

                                So if you know people like this, you can thank them for the increasingly restrictive constraints being built into your car.
                                Originally posted by Redd8407
                                I WANT NOISE! SPEED! AN ENGINE THAT SHAKES MY INTERNAL ORGANS LIKE THEY GOT PARKINSON'S! I DONT WANT AN ENGINE THAT IS PARTIALLY POWERED BY MY LAPTOP BATTERY!
                                Originally posted by Z28ISGR8
                                WHY THE F*CK IS THERE A GOAT ON A FERRARI?
                                Originally posted by Darren
                                I think it is because I take it in and out all the time, the rubber has just stretched out, especially at the bottom where it is really thin. It annoys me more then anything.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X