welp since i have horendus wheel hop and once i put my relocation brackets on i want to get some tubular lower control arms but not sure what would be better, if i got adjustable ones or just the non adjustable ones
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
adjustable or non adjustable lca's
Collapse
X
-
The Joke Master
- June 30th, 2005
- 8513
- Jasen
- Retiring the 80Z project and Moving on
- Grand Rapids
- Mechanical Designer
- Send PM
I would think adjustable would always be better. That way you can change something if you need to. However, there may be information about them I'm not aware of.
-
Friend of mine has them on his '84 Camaro and hates the adjustables. He said he'd rather have stock then the adjustable LCA's2005 Yamaha R6
1999 Pontiac Trans Am - LS1 - M6 - ITSSLOW - 12.998@109.59 - SOLD
1994 Chevrolet Camaro - 3.4L - M5 - ITSSLWR - 16.558@85.38


2003 Chevrolet Blazer
2001 Yamaha YZ426F
Comment
-
Yeah, then the come out of alignment, and you get to spend more moneyOriginally posted by kammi10 View Postwhy does he hate them, do they come loose on him ?2005 Yamaha R6
1999 Pontiac Trans Am - LS1 - M6 - ITSSLOW - 12.998@109.59 - SOLD
1994 Chevrolet Camaro - 3.4L - M5 - ITSSLWR - 16.558@85.38


2003 Chevrolet Blazer
2001 Yamaha YZ426F
Comment
-
The Joke Master
- June 30th, 2005
- 8513
- Jasen
- Retiring the 80Z project and Moving on
- Grand Rapids
- Mechanical Designer
- Send PM
-
You drive it on the street... the rod-ends are not very... umm comfortable
I dont like poly either due to binding.
Best performance is the rod-ends
Best comfort is stock rubber (the 4th gen LE1 cars had thicker rubber than standard.. which i would reccomend.. but your 3rd gen)
I have the rod ends on my car and its not bad.. but they will wear out quickly with standard street use.. i'd bet you'd only see maybe 10k miles with a set of rod ends before they start clunking more than you can stand.
Oh.. and mine have NOT come loose yet.. so thats not a big problem.
Comment





Comment