need a full bolt ons list and gains estimate

[9302z28SS]

Damn I hope I'm not only at 300 horse. If so this was all a waste.

Its tuned but not fully tuned. Needs a reburn from pcm forless.

[jderry]

Damn I hope I'm not only at 300 horse. If so this was all a waste.

Its tuned but not fully tuned. Needs a reburn from pcm forless.

300rwhp is pretty good for nothing serious being done to the car.
Make it put that 300rwhp down to the pavement efficiently.

I would skip paying PCMforless. You will gain more with a good tune.
I feel that someone that can sit in your car and tune it will do more for you.

Steve does a great job.

[jderry]

Dyno Sheets (1).jpg
Dyno Sheets (3).jpg
This is a few years old.
267 HP and 293 FTLB
It was 96* outside, 22% relative humidity.
Pacesetter long tubes and ORY
Stock catback
K&N CAI
Mad tuner tune.

[JoeliusZ28]

Hard to agree when Joel's cam only is putting down ~373 or 376? Somewhere in there.

Its cam only in the sense there is no head or intake porting. Valve bowls were polished and compression was upped, plus i have both a lid and 3" true duals...both of which made a big difference from what it had previously on the same engine. With a CAI and single 3" id probably be closer to 350rwhp. And those were supposed to be sufficient according to "experts"


Also OP, do not confuse rwhp with hp.

[9302z28SS]

I'd like to atleast hit 400 plus crank horse power

Mine is a 93 so I need a chip burned.
How much does it run do you know?

With my bolt ons and a tune fron steve what do you think I can put down?

[jderry]

I'd like to atleast hit 400 plus crank horse power

Mine is a 93 so I need a chip burned.
How much does it run do you know?

With my bolt ons and a tune fron steve what do you think I can put down?

If your car is running as fast as your sig says consistently probably more then the 267 I put down.
My car was running 13.30s, but that was on a 2100 stall 12" converter too.
I would worry less about numbers, and even less about crank hp.
Just get it performing well and enjoy it.

[9302z28SS]

Well it runs ok but at 40 if I hit it, it won't pickup and go.
I'm going to install longtubes and run duals dumped at the axle.

I just want something fun to drive

[9302z28SS]

re

Nd aren't our cars tayed at 275 hp stock

[jderry]

Nd aren't our cars tayed at 275 hp stock

Yeah maybe brand new they may have made that at the crank.
So 230 rwhp stock

[9302z28SS]

Well that sucks..... my motor was rebuilt and heads decked so
I hope I make alittle more....

[jderry]

Well that sucks..... my motor was rebuilt and heads decked so
I hope I make alittle more....

With added compression you should make more power.
But head work isn't really a bolt on type thing.

I think too many people are overly concerned with hp numbers
Track times mean more as to how it performs

[9302z28SS]

Right, well hopefully I can get some better performance out of
Long tubes. I need a better lower end.

I have a good top end. My car oddly makes a lot! Of top end power.
At 40 I can drop it into 1st and make fast power over 4500rpm
And bark 2nd hard, I like that about my car.

[JoeliusZ28]

Well that sucks..... my motor was rebuilt and heads decked so
I hope I make alittle more....

So youd be disappointed in a stock engine making stock numbers? According to your sig youre running 12s already, not like thats anything to complain about for bolt ons imo.

[BP_Z28]

I'm at 307 HP which is stock bhp
Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2

[farmington]

400 crank horsepower is right around 330rwhp. And that depends on the dyno. a mustang will be approx 20-25 below a superflow. my cam only (224r) with full boltons made 375 on a mustang. Very happy with that.