Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Difference between Trans Am and WS6

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Difference between Trans Am and WS6

    Okay I know, I know. I should know this but what are the component differences between them? The LT1 TA is touted at a mere 270 HP where as the WS6 is 325 HP. Is it heads or intake, or what?

  • #2
    WS6 was 305 HP.

    I would imagine intake and exhaust.
    Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

    "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

    Comment


    • #3
      did they put the lt4 in them or was that the firehawk?
      sigpic
      Sold!
      www.fquick.com/lozanoa11
      94 Grand Cherokee (sold)
      95 Accord(for sale)
      99 Outback (snow destroyer)

      Comment


      • #4
        They put LT4s in only 29 Firehawks in '97. That was all the LT4s in Firebirds.
        Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

        "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

        Comment


        • #5
          the lt1 was 285, the ws6 was rated at 305 though due to the ram air

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by cjmatt View Post
            the lt1 was 285, the ws6 was rated at 305 though due to the ram air
            Was there any suspension differences? Or is it just hood, ram air intake, and wheels?

            Comment


            • #7
              Here's what I found.

              Originally posted by transamworld.com
              Ordering the WS6 package added twin nostrils (air intakes) on the hood which boosted the engine rating to 305 bhp. All came with 17" wheels and 275/40-17 tires, plus the 1LE suspension, except with DeCarbon shocks using different valving from the stock shocks.
              Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

              "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

              Comment


              • #8
                thats hard to belive the ram air does that much. it really only works at 90 mph and up. it has to be in the tuning
                sigpic
                Sold!
                www.fquick.com/lozanoa11
                94 Grand Cherokee (sold)
                95 Accord(for sale)
                99 Outback (snow destroyer)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Well - it's certainly WAY easier to get air into the engine, instead of some restrictive normal airbox.
                  Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

                  "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by phoenix_rising View Post
                    Was there any suspension differences? Or is it just hood, ram air intake, and wheels?
                    Yes there was different shocks.
                    The WS6 got the Blistine shocks where the TA, Formula, Firbird, Camaro, & Z28 just go the standard Decarbon shocks that are on every F-Body.

                    Other than the hood, better intake system, bump in HP (cam I think), and better wheels and I think some ground efects that is all.

                    As far as the Exhaust system I think it was the same as any other V8 unless it was a SLP pkg on the Pontiac's.



                    VicePresident of West Michigan Firebird Club
                    A.K.A The Maverick
                    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/660128/1
                    93 TA Currently Under Construction AGAIN
                    2007 2500 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab w/ 6.0L & 3.73's

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      i'm pretty sure the cam is the same. The WS6 package was only Hood. Suspension. Air Intake.

                      I'm pretty sure...
                      Last edited by Lucky SOB; January 10th, 2008, 10:40 PM. Reason: add
                      2000 Trans Am l 1967 Firebird

                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        there was no difference in the engines other than the ram air...305 was just what it was rated, who knows what they really put down...ls1s were rated at 315 and made way more than that anyhow

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I love underrating.
                          Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

                          "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The EPA loves over rating gas mileage... usually by about 2-3 mpg from what studies have shown.
                            2000 Trans Am l 1967 Firebird

                            sigpic

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              ...Cough...Prius...Cough...

                              That was about 15 mpg over rated...
                              Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

                              "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X