Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Underforming L99 engine Camaros : problem, diagnosis, and cure

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Underforming L99 engine Camaros : problem, diagnosis, and cure

    A not insignificant number of V8 L99 engined Camaro owners have reported sluggish acceleration and seemingly underperforming power from their cars. These owners’ experiences not only relied on the old “butt dyno” but were borne out in timed acceleration runs showing slower-than-official estimated acceleration times.Recently, member Scott@Bjorn3d’s L99 based Camaro was examined by GM [...]

    More...
    Automated Birthday Announcement User

  • #2
    Underforming? that must be a new manufacturing process..

    Comment


    • #3
      WOW. The difference there was insane...

      So the dealers need to stop putting regular in...
      Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

      "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

      Comment


      • #4
        Wonder who the idiot was who put the regular unleaded in the car in the first place.
        Most of the Dealers have their own tanks and pumps and usually have them filled with Premium Esp. a Chevrolet Dealership considering they sell Corvettes. So this sounds like the typicla uninformed Salesman.
        Craig
        Semi Retired Street Racer
        2012 Lava Red Mustang GT 5.0 MT82
        GONE BUT NOT FORGOTEN
        sigpic

        NBM `98 Formula M6 HdTp

        1 of 1 Build Date 3/12/98

        "Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

        "For you who believe all you read, I caution you - you are daily being brainwashed for profit by extremely effective psychology with very little regard to factual accuracy. In short, you're at the mercy of the world's greatest bullshit artists with the morals of a stray tomcat."
        - Smokey Yunick

        Comment


        • #5
          Agreed craig. Idk why as a salesman you'd think putting 87 oct in a sports car would be ok?

          Comment


          • #6
            I wonder if those tools would put 87 in say...a Cobalt SS...I'm thinking yes.
            Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

            "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by MP81 View Post
              I wonder if those tools would put 87 in say...a Cobalt SS...I'm thinking yes.
              if they're putting it in an actual performance car like a Camaro SS, then yes I would easily see them putting it in a Cobalt SS.
              - Brian Meissen
              Owner, MiFBody.com
              Administrator, LTxTech.com


              1994 Camaro LT1 Transplant - 357ci LT1, cammed, stalled, and driven.
              2022 Camaro LT1 - "Cherry Bomb 2"
              Michigan FBody Meet & Greet Car Show 2022
              June 4th, 2022 - 9am to 3pm!!!
              The HUB Stadium, Auburn Hills, MI

              Comment


              • #8
                seems like a mod coming! put a switch on dash to select octane level. The tree huggers would like even lower octane.
                sigpic
                1998 Trans Am Convertible A4 - WS6 hood, WS6 air lid, WS6 rims, drilled/slotted rotors.

                Comment


                • #9
                  actually.. higher octane allows more efficient engines... so i doubt tree huggers would push for lower octane

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by meissen View Post
                    if they're putting it in an actual performance car like a Camaro SS, then yes I would easily see them putting it in a Cobalt SS.
                    That's funny. You do know the Cobalt SS is almost as fast as the Camaro SS around Nuerburgring, right? Only 2 seconds separating them.

                    Originally posted by DanO View Post
                    actually.. higher octane allows more efficient engines... so i doubt tree huggers would push for lower octane
                    Very good point.
                    Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

                    "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by MP81 View Post
                      That's funny. You do know the Cobalt SS is almost as fast as the Camaro SS around Nuerburgring, right? Only 2 seconds separating them.
                      Yeah but just because they make a cavalier fast doesn't mean I'm going to consider it a performance vehicle.
                      Last edited by meissen; August 26th, 2009, 02:01 PM.
                      - Brian Meissen
                      Owner, MiFBody.com
                      Administrator, LTxTech.com


                      1994 Camaro LT1 Transplant - 357ci LT1, cammed, stalled, and driven.
                      2022 Camaro LT1 - "Cherry Bomb 2"
                      Michigan FBody Meet & Greet Car Show 2022
                      June 4th, 2022 - 9am to 3pm!!!
                      The HUB Stadium, Auburn Hills, MI

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Yeah, but the Caviler sucks. The Cobalt is a bit better than that...

                        I consider it a performance vehicle...
                        Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

                        "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X