Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Motor Week 1987 IROC-Z Video

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Motor Week 1987 IROC-Z Video

    I have never tried this before.... but here is my attempt to embed a link to this cool Motor Week Segment

    http://www.youtube.com/v/ZyEmSmkzERg...olor2=0xcd311b

    It is a video on Youtube....... ENJOY
    1987 IROC-Z 5.7 TPI
    1969 SS-350 Convertible
    1967 Shelby GT 500KR
    2000 ZR-2 Blazer

    I tend to be a very introverted person... so please force me to talk by initiating conversation.
    sigpic

  • #2
    Sweet !!!!!!!!!!!

    Nice find.
    RIP Doug,You will always be remembered
    3/3/53 ~ 12/22/10

    Western Michigan Camaro Club - President
    2002 Hot Rod Magazine Ltd. Ed. by Berger
    1985 Camaro IROC-Z
    1974 Camaro Type LT / Z28
    2002 Trail Blazer LTZ
    2003 Honda VFR 800i Interceptor

    1996 Camaro SS (Sold )

    www.wmcamaro.org

    Comment


    • #3
      cool video!
      Western Michigan Camaro Club ~ President
      1987 Camaro IROC-Z Pearl White & Black w/ Red Pearl, 355 TPI, A4, 3:42, AirRide,"GOMARO"
      2017 Silverado Double Cab Z71 Pepperdust Metallic, 5.3, A6, 3:42, "SASYZ71"
      2005 Pontiac Grand Prix GT White, 3800
      WMCC Website www.wmcamaro.org

      "A government big enough to give you everything you want,
      is strong enough to take everything you have." — Thomas Jefferson

      "Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who
      are willing to work and give to those who would not."
      Thomas Jefferson

      Comment


      • #4
        Oh that is great! Was there ever one for 85? I would love to own a whole collection of these videos of camaro test drives. Thanks!
        WMCC Member (well, I get the newsletter)
        1973 Camaro Type PT (Type Pro-Tour)
        1973 TransAm 455 4-Speed, In need of Resto.
        1985 Camaro IROC-Z, All Original Silver Hardtop
        1997 Camaro Z4C SS LT4, #18 of 100
        2002 Camaro Z7D SS, #4 Brickyard 400, Robby Gordon
        http://www.aasencamaros.com

        Comment


        • #5
          Man, that guy has been with Motor Week forever.

          Isn't that the famed '86 test mule? That one didn't have A/C yet, and I know the rumored '86 5.7L TPI Mules didn't have A/C...
          Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

          "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Xelerator View Post
            Oh that is great! Was there ever one for 85? I would love to own a whole collection of these videos of camaro test drives. Thanks!
            All I know of is a few 85 commercials:

            http://www.youtube.com/v/MI2B3ldx6Q0...olor2=0xcd311b

            Originally posted by MP81 View Post
            Man, that guy has been with Motor Week forever.

            Isn't that the famed '86 test mule? That one didn't have A/C yet, and I know the rumored '86 5.7L TPI Mules didn't have A/C...
            He has been there forever... and yes it is the 86 5.7 test mule w/o ac.. good call
            1987 IROC-Z 5.7 TPI
            1969 SS-350 Convertible
            1967 Shelby GT 500KR
            2000 ZR-2 Blazer

            I tend to be a very introverted person... so please force me to talk by initiating conversation.
            sigpic

            Comment


            • #7
              "14.5 seconds at 95mph... Thats FAST"

              lol

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by DanO View Post
                "14.5 seconds at 95mph... Thats FAST"

                lol
                It was FAST 21 years ago for a production car.... the corvette wasn't much faster... Mine does 13.98 at 102.5mph w/ MT's on the rear... and it is a stock L98 w/ a hollowed out CAT. Fairly respectible still for what the car is.


                The factory rating on the 2000 SS was what 13.0 at 109 mph? the 87 IROC only has 225 hp, that's 120 hp less than the 2000 SS... doesn't seem like a lot of improvement in 21 years
                1987 IROC-Z 5.7 TPI
                1969 SS-350 Convertible
                1967 Shelby GT 500KR
                2000 ZR-2 Blazer

                I tend to be a very introverted person... so please force me to talk by initiating conversation.
                sigpic

                Comment


                • #9
                  120hp is quite a bit..

                  its nearly a 50% increase

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by DanO View Post
                    120hp is quite a bit..

                    its nearly a 50% increase
                    Ya, a 50% increase in hp rating; at what rpm I don't know and what TQ rating too...... but only a second better in the 1/4 mile? with that much HP increase..... should be doing better times???
                    1987 IROC-Z 5.7 TPI
                    1969 SS-350 Convertible
                    1967 Shelby GT 500KR
                    2000 ZR-2 Blazer

                    I tend to be a very introverted person... so please force me to talk by initiating conversation.
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The LB9 has nearly as much torque, though...crazy
                      Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

                      "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by dboersma View Post
                        Ya, a 50% increase in hp rating; at what rpm I don't know and what TQ rating too...... but only a second better in the 1/4 mile? with that much HP increase..... should be doing better times???

                        not really.. horsepower is not linear to 1/4 time or trap speed..

                        horsepower requirement goes up at an exponential rate vs 1/4mile time and trap speed..

                        Torque means nothing in the 1/4... HP is everything
                        Last edited by DanO; May 20th, 2008, 10:00 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          That is not my point.... in all that time, the 1/4 mile only improved over my stock L98 by a second.... 1/4 mile time = not much improvement........

                          How old are you? In 1987 the IROC was king of the road, it creamed Mustang GT's left and right. The only domestic car able to beat it was the Corvette. Yes, maybe today production cars are a little faster in the 1/4 but not by much. They aren't making high compression 60's muscle capable of 12's in the 1/4 anymore. And to get a car in the 12's today means losing wieght and engine mods......

                          I don't think the 87 numbers on the Camaro are anything to laugh at.
                          1987 IROC-Z 5.7 TPI
                          1969 SS-350 Convertible
                          1967 Shelby GT 500KR
                          2000 ZR-2 Blazer

                          I tend to be a very introverted person... so please force me to talk by initiating conversation.
                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by DanO View Post
                            Torque means nothing in the 1/4... HP is everything
                            I disagree

                            Torque gets you off the line.... HP gets you past the line....

                            The car with the most torque will likely have the better 60', which could make for a better over all ET, depending. The HP is a measure of rate of work done and affects acceleration over the length of the track, which has a big effect on ET.

                            Look at a diesel truck (no, not with a chip) Scads of torque but little HP, easy to move away from a standing start but not a lot of MPH. If you had a drag car with 500 ft/lbs and 20 RWHP, it'd leave like a rocket then peg out at about 44 MPH (3000 lb car, 1/4 mile).

                            Flip it over, the car with 20 ft/lbs and 500 RWHP takes a week to get to the 60' mark but is running 128 MPH at the stripe. Think "turbo Buick". The 500 HP car will out-accelerate the torque car.

                            That's an exaggeration, but the end effect. TQ and HP are related mathematically -
                            (TQ * RPM ) / 5252 = HP

                            400 ft/lbs @ 4000 RPM = 304 HP @ 4000
                            400 ft/lbs @ 6000 RPM = 456 HP @ 6000

                            Which is why you you raise the RPM operating level in a race engine.
                            1987 IROC-Z 5.7 TPI
                            1969 SS-350 Convertible
                            1967 Shelby GT 500KR
                            2000 ZR-2 Blazer

                            I tend to be a very introverted person... so please force me to talk by initiating conversation.
                            sigpic

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Right.

                              To put simply.

                              You wanna go fast early, you build up low-speed torque.

                              You wanna go fast later, you build for high-RPM horsepower.
                              Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

                              "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X