Turbo Kit Discussion Thread

[Boostme]

Everything you have posted has been theory anyways. Hell communism worked well in theory.

Where are your facts? Where are your back to back pulls showing how a 2" spools xxx amount RPM's faster than a 2.5" and will support xxx amount of power?

he posted facts but they were removed

[kammi10]

Every turbo gets smaller to the wheel on the exhaust side! Why? Tell me turbo god.

ohh sweet.. now im a turbo god.. awesome.. thanks..

im not dis agreeing that its not going to increase velocity.. im just saying it will work just fine for what he wants to do with it..

[shawnc16]

Everything you have posted has been theory anyways. Hell communism worked well in theory.

Where are your facts? Where are your back to back pulls showing how a 2" spools xxx amount RPM's faster than a 2.5" and will support xxx amount of power?

Ah! I'm glad you asked! Let me get to a computer instead of my phone

[c0ncEpT]

he posted facts but they were removed

By facts you mean numbers showing exhaust velocity between different size pipes? Where did it show that said car went any faster with 2"? Or that said car spooled xxx amount faster? Or 2" supported xxx amount of power before it was a restriction? I'm still waiting for those facts

[Boostme]

By facts you mean numbers showing exhaust velocity between different size pipes? Where did it show that said car went any faster with 2"? Or that said car spooled xxx amount faster? Or 2" supported xxx amount of power before it was a restriction? I'm still waiting for those facts

If you move more cfm what do you think that does? And moving more cfm will cause less of a restriction correct?

[c0ncEpT]

You know what Shawn your right. 2" would spool faster and support enough power for what 90% of people want to do.

But 2.5" has been used for years in cars making anywhere from 500 to 2000 so whats problem? This is what he built and unless there is an overwhelming want for a 2" kit from people who are actually going to buy a kit than why change it?

[kammi10]

If you move more cfm what do you think that does? And moving more cfm will cause less of a restriction correct?

hmm i didnt know a smaller pipe will move more cfm.. that must be why in heads they make the ports smaller to flow more..




ohh wait they dont.. they make them bigger to flow more..

im done ****in argueing with you guys.. you obviously know more then me.. which is why you;d build your own kit anyway and wouldnt be interested in this one..

[shawnc16]

I love the first line. Admitting that facts trump 5 yrs of so and so's experience. Do you think the carb vs. Fuel injection debate will end soon too? Nah!

[shawnc16]

hmm i didnt know a smaller pipe will move more cfm.. that must be why in heads they make the ports smaller to flow more..




ohh wait they dont.. they make them bigger to flow more..

im done ****in argueing with you guys.. you obviously know more then me.. which is why you;d build your own kit anyway and wouldnt be interested in this one..

Why would you take out a 260/260 duration cam that had 600 HP in a N/A engine and put in a cam with 230/230 duration for a turbo setup that makes 800 HP?

[c0ncEpT]

What he built is what it is so I don't see why the hell your even posting in here when your never going to buy anything from him anyways? Go troll somewhere else please.

[kammi10]

You know what Shawn your right. 2" would spool faster and support enough power for what 90% of people want to do.

But 2.5" has been used for years in cars making anywhere from 500 to 2000 so whats problem? This is what he built and unless there is an overwhelming want for a 2" kit from people who are actually going to buy a kit than why change it?

exactly.. for someone who wants to be serious about a turbo build and make stupid power more then likely are not going to be buying an off the shelf turbo kit for their car.. they will have one custom made

[Boostme]

hmm i didnt know a smaller pipe will move more cfm.. that must be why in heads they make the ports smaller to flow more..




ohh wait they dont.. they make them bigger to flow more..

im done ****in argueing with you guys.. you obviously know more then me.. which is why you;d build your own kit anyway and wouldnt be interested in this one..

The point we are trying to prove is you cant just go saying "This works the best! just because it does" with no proof. there is absolutely no problem with the kit. 2.5" does work. Just cant say its the best with no proof or even trying anything else.

[kammi10]

The point we are trying to prove is you cant just go saying "This works the best! just because it does" with no proof. there is absolutely no problem with the kit. 2.5" does work. Just cant say its the best with no proof or even trying anything else.

i agree with you however for what his goals are that size will work perfect for him getting to those goals..

[shawnc16]

i agree with you however for what his goals are that size will work perfect for him getting to those goals..

Why not build a 3" crossover? That would be perfect for his goals too? Might have more lag but it will support the HP.

[kammi10]

Why not build a 3" crossover? That would be perfect for his goals too? Might have more lag but it will support the HP.

your such a genious.. i wish i knew everything like you about turbos..

your turbo kit done yet? trying to figure out when we can line up your turd gen and my turd gen so i can drag your ass down the track