I agree, GMHTP couldnt build a LT1 to save thier arse, lol. Why, I dont know, I dont think its that hard, lol. And the numbers I remember from thier formula project were around 330 rwhp, lol. From NuTek IIRC. Eric L
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Spark plugs burning uneven - Pics Included!
Collapse
X
-

1997 Camaro SS #2819 M6, Red, 3.42, 1 of 27, Ttops, BBK shorty headers, Flowmaster cat back, 1.6 rr, LT4 valve springs, ASAM CAI, Centerforce clutch, runs 12s, breaks 10 bolts.
http://s602.photobucket.com/albums/t...20Camaro%20SS/

1963 Plymouth Valiant Signet 200, 6.0 LS3, Carb, Rapid Motorsports Dominator 2X cam.
http://s602.photobucket.com/albums/t...uth%20Valiant/
-
-
-
Originally posted by ThreeHonks View Postwell they are the stock rails with AN bungs and in parallel.
Parallel rails are nice, but not necessary. That is not my problem. The one quote posted by John in this thread was from GM high tech. They know nothing about building an LT1, there project LT1 car with a trickflow (ported heads) biug cam and 383 just made like a whopping 370 to the tire.Originally posted by prorac1 View PostI agree, GMHTP couldnt build a LT1 to save thier arse, lol. Why, I dont know, I dont think its that hard, lol. And the numbers I remember from thier formula project were around 330 rwhp, lol. From NuTek IIRC. Eric LPerhaps i should send them my results, lol.Originally posted by ThreeHonks View PostIt was extremely low. but I think they just updated it with different heads and cam and the 24x system and it did like 370-380... out of a 383. piss poor if you ask me-Joel
1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd

WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop
Comment



Comment