Im looking to build my 98 camaro and the old 4l60 is shot.im gunna be building a reverse manual valve body,trans brake, and a 3400-3500 stall. School me on which one would be better to build and preferably cheaper.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
4l80 vs th400
Collapse
X
-
I don't know the answer, but good move stepping up from the 60e! Youre on the right track either way! First upgrade id do to a straight line car.-Joel
1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd

WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop
-
Post Slut
- December 9th, 2011
- 5919
- Michael H
- 1989 Iroc-Z Convertible/1998 Z28
- Lowell, MI
- Meat Processor
- Send PM
I'll buy your burned out trans!
1998 Camaro Z28 - Bright Red, 6.0 TR224, 4l60e, 3.42 Eaton TrueTrac
1989 Camaro IROC-Z Convertible - 355 big tube TPI, WC T5, 3.42 Zexel Torsen, CTS-V/C4 brakes
1955 Bel Air 2 Door Post - 357 TPI, Muncie M20, 4 wheel disc
2006 Saab 9-7x 5.3i Daily Driver
Comment
-
Post Slut
- December 9th, 2011
- 5919
- Michael H
- 1989 Iroc-Z Convertible/1998 Z28
- Lowell, MI
- Meat Processor
- Send PM
I meant to say some other things as well, my mind has been MIA today...
4l80e is an evolution of the th400. 4l80e has overdrive and a locking converter, th400 doesn't. The th400 will be cheaper to build, but I'd only go that route if it was a weekend car or a track only car.
1998 Camaro Z28 - Bright Red, 6.0 TR224, 4l60e, 3.42 Eaton TrueTrac
1989 Camaro IROC-Z Convertible - 355 big tube TPI, WC T5, 3.42 Zexel Torsen, CTS-V/C4 brakes
1955 Bel Air 2 Door Post - 357 TPI, Muncie M20, 4 wheel disc
2006 Saab 9-7x 5.3i Daily Driver
Comment
-
Both are very strong transmissions when build properly but the 80e will cost almost 2x as much and is heavier so I'd go 400 unless your set on keeping OD.Doing less with more

Comment
-
What mike said is pretty much 100% spot on. The 80 is essentially a th400 with OD and lock up. The 80 isn't much more expensive really, the valve body with a brake is a few bucks more, and a lock up converter will be a few bucks more as well, otherwise the rest is just replacing soft parts and new steels1998 Camaro SS Bullseye Turbo
2002 F-250 7.3 Leveled on 20s with 35's
2006 Yamaha R6 50th Anniversary
http://www.mifbody.com/vbulletin/sho...-Update/page11

Comment
-
I have no real preference, the car is only a weekend warrior and sometimes driven to work. Never daily driven. I think the th400 will be a easier route im just worried about the speedo. My budget is around 1000. Not including converter,driveshaft, flexplate, odds and ends, don't care about overdrive but im not against it.
Comment
-
Post Slut
- December 9th, 2011
- 5919
- Michael H
- 1989 Iroc-Z Convertible/1998 Z28
- Lowell, MI
- Meat Processor
- Send PM
you can put a 40 tooth reluctor wheel on there and a VSS
1998 Camaro Z28 - Bright Red, 6.0 TR224, 4l60e, 3.42 Eaton TrueTrac
1989 Camaro IROC-Z Convertible - 355 big tube TPI, WC T5, 3.42 Zexel Torsen, CTS-V/C4 brakes
1955 Bel Air 2 Door Post - 357 TPI, Muncie M20, 4 wheel disc
2006 Saab 9-7x 5.3i Daily Driver
Comment
-
-
-
-
Yea ive been waiting for one to pop up on Craigslist, anyone have one built before? I can pick up a core and get it built but don't know of the price range I'd be looking at with a brake rmvb and some stronger internals, ive read a stock th400 can take quite a bit of abuse.
Comment
-
Post Slut
- December 9th, 2011
- 5919
- Michael H
- 1989 Iroc-Z Convertible/1998 Z28
- Lowell, MI
- Meat Processor
- Send PM
how much power are you looking to put in front of it?
1998 Camaro Z28 - Bright Red, 6.0 TR224, 4l60e, 3.42 Eaton TrueTrac
1989 Camaro IROC-Z Convertible - 355 big tube TPI, WC T5, 3.42 Zexel Torsen, CTS-V/C4 brakes
1955 Bel Air 2 Door Post - 357 TPI, Muncie M20, 4 wheel disc
2006 Saab 9-7x 5.3i Daily Driver
Comment



Comment