Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

tpi questions

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    oh no you don't technically need a rear upgrade either way... Just with the 350 im suer you'd have extra cash.
    1989 Chevrolet Camaro- Currently in pieces...

    Comment


    • #17
      I had a 350 tpi, putting in an LS1/T56. I bought a 99+ tank to get around the fuel pump (Tpi f/p won't last long at LS1 fuel pressures) from a guy parting his car out, so that was cheap. Engine trans & pcm was $3000 a few years ago. You'll probably spend less in the long run just going LSx, and even if it is a bit more, it'll be newer/more effecient. Just my

      Comment


      • #18
        i planned on eather starting with a lsx block or getting a iron block out of a truck.
        sigpic
        Sold!
        www.fquick.com/lozanoa11
        94 Grand Cherokee (sold)
        95 Accord(for sale)
        99 Outback (snow destroyer)

        Comment


        • #19
          wait a minute?..

          Im not to famillair with the truck blocks... Are the 5.3 and 6.0 both "Lsx" blocks. or is one and not the other.

          I dont know much about them except my truck has one and thats about it. Its got the 6.0
          1989 Chevrolet Camaro- Currently in pieces...

          Comment


          • #20
            depends on the year im not shure on the specifics
            sigpic
            Sold!
            www.fquick.com/lozanoa11
            94 Grand Cherokee (sold)
            95 Accord(for sale)
            99 Outback (snow destroyer)

            Comment


            • #21
              Maybe ill have to try and talk my dad into letting me part out his truck

              I think he'll go for it.
              1989 Chevrolet Camaro- Currently in pieces...

              Comment


              • #22
                Tpi Power

                hello I like the question, so I thought I would give my opinion. I have a 305 With a Tpi and to be honest I hang with most 5.7's I have made slight adjustments to the prom and throttle body. I would encourage keeping the Tpi that was the greatest thing the camaro offered in the mid 80's. granted their is allot of test and tuning to do but once you found the sweet spot you will be very impressed with the throttle response,efficiency, and over all power . I was at the same cross road but before I gave up I did tuning and I will never look back from the Tpi again.

                Comment


                • #23
                  i don't have a tpi yet. i want to do a lsx swap in a third gen and i just wanted to know if the l98 tpi 350 would have enough power to keep me happy untill i finish every thing
                  sigpic
                  Sold!
                  www.fquick.com/lozanoa11
                  94 Grand Cherokee (sold)
                  95 Accord(for sale)
                  99 Outback (snow destroyer)

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    5.7 TPI
                    Nitrous
                    Drag Radials
                    Headers
                    Low 13s
                    -08 G8 GT DD: Rotofab CAI, HID's, Breyton Race GTS'
                    -86 Iroc Project: LQ4, Th400, S400, Ford 9"

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by shawnc16 View Post
                      5.7 TPI
                      Nitrous
                      Drag Radials
                      Headers
                      Low 13s
                      thank you thats what i was asking for!
                      sigpic
                      Sold!
                      www.fquick.com/lozanoa11
                      94 Grand Cherokee (sold)
                      95 Accord(for sale)
                      99 Outback (snow destroyer)

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        My 305 TPI isn't that slow.

                        I drove a 350 TPI and it spun the tires in second gear - it was stock.
                        Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

                        "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          the one i drove was no faster if not slower than my 98 v6. so thats what im baseing it on. but the slowest camaro in 96 was faster than the most powerfull camaro in 84 if i remember the years right
                          sigpic
                          Sold!
                          www.fquick.com/lozanoa11
                          94 Grand Cherokee (sold)
                          95 Accord(for sale)
                          99 Outback (snow destroyer)

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            TPI's make good low end torque, that's why they can feel quick...but they are not for the most part.
                            sigpic
                            Turbo Charged LS1/T56

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              TPI is a good setup. Just restrictive.

                              Porting the intake and getting bigger runners helps a ton, I've heard.
                              Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

                              "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                TPI FTW! You can always bore and stroke, many TPIS makin over 500 ft/lbs of torque. Boo-yah!
                                Makin Torque.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X