Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

11' stang 5.0 dyno, 395hp at rear wheels!

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by my95z28 View Post
    LOTS of mustang owners do LTs, Full exhaust, and CAI to pick up some more ponies. Can't be done with this one, while all of those mods are still showing great improvements with the Ls3. Plus, when you want to go above those numbers it isn't as simple as just throwing a s/c on there like SOOOO many owners like to do.
    From a marketing stand point, this separates GT500 and GT. Different strokes for different folks. I am sure they will figure some way to get more power out of this motor. LT will still show some kind of a gain, CAI will find some kind of gain. As for a SC....sounds like 5.0 owners are f'd. With time the aftermarket will learn the motor and its secrets. May take a few years but it will happen. I just cant believe that the motor is maxed from the factory, this wouldnt be much of an improvement over the 4.6.

    No one thought the 4.6 would end up at 315 stock.
    1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 - 6 Speed

    Comment


    • #17
      Yeah, but lets not forget how many years it took them to GET it to 315 hp. Im deffinately impressed, but like was already said, it was a preproduction car. Ill wait to see a few more production cars dyno before I pass judgement. I will say though, if production cars can put down those numbers, its going to be the closest camaro mustang race in a LONG time. This is going to be cool. Eric L

      1997 Camaro SS #2819 M6, Red, 3.42, 1 of 27, Ttops, BBK shorty headers, Flowmaster cat back, 1.6 rr, LT4 valve springs, ASAM CAI, Centerforce clutch, runs 12s, breaks 10 bolts.
      http://s602.photobucket.com/albums/t...20Camaro%20SS/


      1963 Plymouth Valiant Signet 200, 6.0 LS3, Carb, Rapid Motorsports Dominator 2X cam.
      http://s602.photobucket.com/albums/t...uth%20Valiant/

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by nascarnate326 View Post
        From a marketing stand point, this separates GT500 and GT. Different strokes for different folks. I am sure they will figure some way to get more power out of this motor. LT will still show some kind of a gain, CAI will find some kind of gain. As for a SC....sounds like 5.0 owners are f'd. With time the aftermarket will learn the motor and its secrets. May take a few years but it will happen. I just cant believe that the motor is maxed from the factory, this wouldnt be much of an improvement over the 4.6.

        No one thought the 4.6 would end up at 315 stock.
        If anything, it puts it closer to the GT500, when it was too close to it already. LTs will pick up a small gain, cold air won't gain anything, it already has one. Look at the specs, it is maxed out from the factory. Like I said, its going to be a great engine for anyone who buys it and never mods it, but for those who do, they are going to have to completely build it to get any significant power gains. Something being built to the limit like this, doesn't lead to good durability either......

        2011 Mustang GT
        20" Satin Black AMRs with 305/35 & 275/35 MT Street Radials, Saleen Grille, CS Lower Valance, Roush Axleback, GT500 Spoiler, resonator delete

        In Progress: Brembo 6-piston brake upgrade


        Comment


        • #19
          rods are maxed out but they are twisting this engine to 7 grand stock? hmmm...

          I like how they spec'd this engine out... im not to worried about getting next to one though
          -Joel
          1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
          1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd


          WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop

          Comment


          • #20
            Where'd the info of the rods being maxed out come from? I'm just curious?
            Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

            "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by MP81 View Post
              Where'd the info of the rods being maxed out come from? I'm just curious?
              me too? do they have PM rods? or forged? i know my friends 03 cobra(i know is completely different car) cam stock with Manley H beams!! factory redline at 7400..
              97 TA AI 355
              2012 Jeep Patriot

              Comment


              • #22
                Yup, pm rods. There was an article on the new 5.0, where ford engineers stated that they had to REALLY lighten up the rods to rev it that high, and sacrificed a lot of strength doing so.

                2011 Mustang GT
                20" Satin Black AMRs with 305/35 & 275/35 MT Street Radials, Saleen Grille, CS Lower Valance, Roush Axleback, GT500 Spoiler, resonator delete

                In Progress: Brembo 6-piston brake upgrade


                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by my95z28 View Post
                  Yup, pm rods. There was an article on the new 5.0, where ford engineers stated that they had to REALLY lighten up the rods to rev it that high, and sacrificed a lot of strength doing so.
                  Not so sure that sounds like a smart move
                  sigpic
                  Turbo Charged LS1/T56

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by my95z28 View Post
                    Yup, pm rods. There was an article on the new 5.0, where ford engineers stated that they had to REALLY lighten up the rods to rev it that high, and sacrificed a lot of strength doing so.
                    well thats junk.. of course.. its a ford, i knew they would cut a corner somewhere..
                    97 TA AI 355
                    2012 Jeep Patriot

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by WMCCjames View Post
                      Not so sure that sounds like a smart move
                      Certainly not...
                      Gone but not forgotten: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

                      "You shall ride eternal. Shiny and chrome."

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by my95z28 View Post
                        Yup, pm rods. There was an article on the new 5.0, where ford engineers stated that they had to REALLY lighten up the rods to rev it that high, and sacrificed a lot of strength doing so.
                        if thats true thats a load of baloney. That engine is only a 3" stroke which should be relatively easy on the rods in the high RPMs.
                        -Joel
                        1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
                        1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd


                        WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X