Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

weld or bolt in SFCs

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • weld or bolt in SFCs

    just wondering which is better. also boxed or tubular. i dont have access to a welder so i will have to find someone who knows how to weld and pay them. also i dont believe my car has relocation brackets and it has been lowered but i dont get the wheel hop like everyone complains of. i do spin off the line although. thanks
    sigpic
    11.84 @ 117 w 1.66 60' (previous na best)

    - - 5.3/4L80e/T7875 - -
    - Huron Speed Turbo Kit -

    1998 Formula

  • #2
    It's all about preference. functionally, weld ins are theoretically better as they actually become a part of your frame. Bolt ins work fine but some people have issues with bolts coming loose and stuff. I like the convenience of boltons, they were easy to install, i can always weld em if i want, and I can remove them if I need to.


    Check out my FQuick!


    TEAM LTWON: JoeliusZ28, 1fstss, pHEnomIC, 96mikez28

    Comment


    • #3
      Here is what I have, UMI
      Still have to put them on yet
      They are weld in, way better!!!




      VicePresident of West Michigan Firebird Club
      A.K.A The Maverick
      http://www.cardomain.com/ride/660128/1
      93 TA Currently Under Construction AGAIN
      2007 2500 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab w/ 6.0L & 3.73's

      Comment


      • #4
        weld-ins are always better, but bolt-ins are better than nothing as well as weldable.

        if you weld your SFCs in the weight of the car must be on its own wheels..
        -Joel
        1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
        1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd


        WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop

        Comment


        • #5
          Weld-in's, no questions asked

          Comment


          • #6
            thanks guys and im think tubular also because it will match the rest of the suspension mods going in.
            sigpic
            11.84 @ 117 w 1.66 60' (previous na best)

            - - 5.3/4L80e/T7875 - -
            - Huron Speed Turbo Kit -

            1998 Formula

            Comment


            • #7
              My plan is just a 2pt weld on. Im guessing I'll end up with boxed because that's what most seem to be.

              1999 Pontiac Trans Am - LS1 - M6 - ITSSLOW - 12.998@109.59 - SOLD
              1994 Chevrolet Camaro
              - 3.4L - M5 - ITSSLWR - 16.558@85.38
              2003 Chevrolet Blazer
              2005 Yamaha R6
              2001 Yamaha YZ426F

              Comment


              • #8
                Mine are still in the box too. (cough Justin cough)
                I bought the spohn tubular SFC's weld on ones.
                sigpic

                Comment


                • #9
                  wow.... i guess im in the minority

                  I'd like you to prove the strength differences between weld in and bolt on. First you would have to define the load paths.

                  In Torsion, the bolt ons would be equally as stiff, For longitudinal forces, the weld in may be better due to the clamp load of the front mount.

                  But, the nice thing about bolt ins.... they can always BECOME weld in's!!

                  Also, it depends on the load direction for comparing tubular to square. Just remember, once you have a bend in a round tube, its compression/tension strentght is completely comprimised and is now a function of the geometry not the steel.

                  either way, i'd get bolt ins, and if you like it.. weld em in. I have not seen an ideal set of SFC's yet. I like my SLP's but they are slightly heavy and one of the square tubes has a bend in it!! But alot of the other designs have bends too.. so i guess they are all about equal.

                  either way, i'd get a 3 point mount, dont even waste your time with 2 point if you are doing SFC's.

                  Just to prove my point, the 3rd point mount is on a spot welded piece of sheetmetal.. i highly doubt there is much force going through the SFC's if this area has not been comprimised.

                  I think we should strain gauge some SFC's to get a true answer!!!!!!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    IMO...Weld on,box ,two pionts..

                    **** FEAR THIS ! ***

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Im going to have to agree with Dan on this one!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        my only concern with the 3 point is that it would need to be removed whenever you are working on the underneath of the car
                        sigpic
                        11.84 @ 117 w 1.66 60' (previous na best)

                        - - 5.3/4L80e/T7875 - -
                        - Huron Speed Turbo Kit -

                        1998 Formula

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          i think weve had this discussion like a million and a half times before. the general consensus is to go with the weld ons

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by MORNINGSTAR2101 View Post
                            i think weve had this discussion like a million and a half times before. the general consensus is to go with the weld ons
                            sorry
                            sigpic
                            11.84 @ 117 w 1.66 60' (previous na best)

                            - - 5.3/4L80e/T7875 - -
                            - Huron Speed Turbo Kit -

                            1998 Formula

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Formula Z View Post
                              sorry




                              VicePresident of West Michigan Firebird Club
                              A.K.A The Maverick
                              http://www.cardomain.com/ride/660128/1
                              93 TA Currently Under Construction AGAIN
                              2007 2500 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab w/ 6.0L & 3.73's

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X