im 17, and my mom wants to buy me a car, so i suggest a 3rd geb V8 camaro or firebird, and she automatically turns it down, she says she wants a more fuel efficient car like a V6. so my question is what do stock V6, 5.0 and 5.7 litre camaros and firebirds get in terms of highway and city mileage, just to compare them to each other.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Gas Mileage
Collapse
X
-
Post Whore
- November 8th, 2009
- 3000
- Tyler Porter
- 85 Z28, 91 Trans am
- Clinton Township Michigan
- student
- Send PM
Gas Mileage
91 Trans am, 305, Lt1 cam, 24lb injectors, headers, SLP LM2, SW chassis, massive panhard, lowered, modded TPI, Tuned, 4.10s, Lincoln locked
85 Z28 406/th400?/3.42 4th gen disc rear/4th gen dash
00 Tahoe Z71........Stock
97 K1500 lt4 cam, 1.6s, MPFI, Solid axled, IROKs,------winter beater -
I have a 3.8 v6 with over 160k miles and it's still kickin'
I suggest you get one compared to the v8, gas mileage is amazing with that thing most of the time its high twentys and low thirties. It has been a while since I calculated the mileage but last time I did I had like 29 Mpg. The car is very peppy with it's light weight. My car has the best gas mileage out of all of our cars (5.3 suburban, and even the ford ranger) and is the fastest by far. Horsepower is just over 200 which isn't bad either. I have heard that the 3800 series II is the best out of the v6 camaro's with the exception for the new 5th gen. the 3800's with an angled throttle body were said to have poor gas mileage, and a 3.4 is nice but for around the same price you can have a more efficient platform with the 3.8.
you can pick up a v6 98-02 camaro for 3k easily, that's what my best friend and I did and we have never looked back since. With a set of headers, CAI, and tune you willl be more than happy for a while, until you can afford an lt1 or ls1 that is. I noticed that plugs, filter, and seafoam helps alot as well
-
Post Whore
- November 8th, 2009
- 3000
- Tyler Porter
- 85 Z28, 91 Trans am
- Clinton Township Michigan
- student
- Send PM
are v6's both automatic, and manual91 Trans am, 305, Lt1 cam, 24lb injectors, headers, SLP LM2, SW chassis, massive panhard, lowered, modded TPI, Tuned, 4.10s, Lincoln locked
85 Z28 406/th400?/3.42 4th gen disc rear/4th gen dash
00 Tahoe Z71........Stock
97 K1500 lt4 cam, 1.6s, MPFI, Solid axled, IROKs,------winter beater
Comment
-
Agree with everything he said. Don't get a 3.4 4th gen, you will never be happy with it. Even a modded 3.4 will have trouble keeping up with a stock 3.8. The 3.8 is an efficient engine, gets good gas mileage and makes decent power, and with the 5 speed, you'll still have some fun with it.Originally posted by Joedashredder93 View PostI have a 3.8 v6 with over 160k miles and it's still kickin'
I suggest you get one compared to the v8, gas mileage is amazing with that thing most of the time its high twentys and low thirties. It has been a while since I calculated the mileage but last time I did I had like 29 Mpg. The car is very peppy with it's light weight. My car has the best gas mileage out of all of our cars (5.3 suburban, and even the ford ranger) and is the fastest by far. Horsepower is just over 200 which isn't bad either. I have heard that the 3800 series II is the best out of the v6 camaro's with the exception for the new 5th gen. the 3800's with an angled throttle body were said to have poor gas mileage, and a 3.4 is nice but for around the same price you can have a more efficient platform with the 3.8.
you can pick up a v6 98-02 camaro for 3k easily, that's what my best friend and I did and we have never looked back since. With a set of headers, CAI, and tune you willl be more than happy for a while, until you can afford an lt1 or ls1 that is. I noticed that plugs, filter, and seafoam helps alot as well
3rd gen V6's I know nothing about, but I would probably go with a newer (96-02) V6 F-Body if for no other reason than lower miles, better reliability, and likely better gas mileage. Not to mention they can be had pretty cheap now.Nick H.
Current MIFC Vice President
sigpic
Comment
-
Post Whore
- November 8th, 2009
- 3000
- Tyler Porter
- 85 Z28, 91 Trans am
- Clinton Township Michigan
- student
- Send PM
thanks for the information guys91 Trans am, 305, Lt1 cam, 24lb injectors, headers, SLP LM2, SW chassis, massive panhard, lowered, modded TPI, Tuned, 4.10s, Lincoln locked
85 Z28 406/th400?/3.42 4th gen disc rear/4th gen dash
00 Tahoe Z71........Stock
97 K1500 lt4 cam, 1.6s, MPFI, Solid axled, IROKs,------winter beater
Comment
-
Post Whore
- November 8th, 2009
- 3000
- Tyler Porter
- 85 Z28, 91 Trans am
- Clinton Township Michigan
- student
- Send PM
thanks for all the help Joe91 Trans am, 305, Lt1 cam, 24lb injectors, headers, SLP LM2, SW chassis, massive panhard, lowered, modded TPI, Tuned, 4.10s, Lincoln locked
85 Z28 406/th400?/3.42 4th gen disc rear/4th gen dash
00 Tahoe Z71........Stock
97 K1500 lt4 cam, 1.6s, MPFI, Solid axled, IROKs,------winter beater
Comment
-
What the hell are you talking about? 3.4 cars are FUN, thats why they were created. Who the hell buys a 3.4 and expects to race it?Originally posted by 93formulalt1 View PostDon't get a 3.4 4th gen, you will never be happy with it. Even a modded 3.4 will have trouble keeping up with a stock 3.8.
These cars arnt all about the 1320, its about the drive.
My 3.4 car got between 17 and 26. Granted a 4th gen V8 will do similar, the 3.4 is by no means a "bad" motor. Most have tons of miles and are not taken care of.1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 - 6 Speed
Comment
-
I had a 99 3.8L with a 5 speed and i think the worst mileage i ever got with it was about 22. It averaged about 27 city and 33 highway. VERY easy to maintain too, the only thing i didnt like about the car was the electric throttle body. The response is terrible and you really notice it with a manual trans... auto is probably not so bad. it was still a fun car to drive though and i wish i still had it.-Joel
1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd

WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop
Comment
-
True on the throttle response, I too wish it wasn't drive by wire. esp when working under the hood and not being able to mess with the throttle. But if you do what I did by shaving the lid it helped alot. I can't wait to eliminate the silencer/baffling and free ram air mod. which I hear improves throttle response and HP.Originally posted by JoeliusZ28 View PostI had a 99 3.8L with a 5 speed and i think the worst mileage i ever got with it was about 22. It averaged about 27 city and 33 highway. VERY easy to maintain too, the only thing i didnt like about the car was the electric throttle body. The response is terrible and you really notice it with a manual trans... auto is probably not so bad. it was still a fun car to drive though and i wish i still had it.
Like nascarnate said "It's all about the drive" I have never raced my car before, but it still has alot of pep for what it is. I have heard of it being easy to beat 5.0 fox bodys though.
I[m really interested on hearing what you do buy though, so keep us informed. If you find one you like and your mom says no, it helps to go look at it and take it for a test drive cause it does change alot of minds.
It's still nothing to compare a stock v8 camaro and a highly modded six but in the end it's still an F body which to me makes it worth every penny.
Comment
-
oh an aftermarket lid will definitely wake up the car in power and response, but TB lag is still TB lag. To paint a picture for you: Id be going full throttle, quick let off and gearchange, and then stab it again letting the clutch out and id feel myself jerk forward because the car was engine braking for a moment even though my foot was already to the floor. And then if i tried to powershift to overcome this issue the synchros in the trans couldnt handle it and id get blocked out of the shift. So basically you just cant shift the 5 speeds quick like you can a T56. Granted, its not my first rodeo and i can shift the average manual trans faster than it wants to beOriginally posted by Joedashredder93 View PostTrue on the throttle response, I too wish it wasn't drive by wire. esp when working under the hood and not being able to mess with the throttle. But if you do what I did by shaving the lid it helped alot. I can't wait to eliminate the silencer/baffling and free ram air mod. which I hear improves throttle response and HP.
Like i said though. ONLY thing i didnt like about the car was that. I still cut a 15.8 quarter mile with that car, and it had a plugged fuel filter at the time.-Joel
1995 Z28 M6 - AI226/234 - autocross ricer
1984 Scottsdale K10 - 305/4bbl/4spd

WTB List:Midwest Chasis DS Loop
Comment
-
I was never happy with my 3.4, after I got into f-bodies, I was always looking for something more. Granted, I miss the manual trans and t-tops, but I was just never really as happy with my 3.4 as I am with my LT1 now. Gas mileage wasn't great enough to really warrant choosing the 6 over the 8, performance sucked, the car was too slow to get out of it's own way on the highway, and when one thing went wrong mechanically, it seemed like 10 more problems appeared out of nowhere.Originally posted by nascarnate326 View PostWhat the hell are you talking about? 3.4 cars are FUN, thats why they were created. Who the hell buys a 3.4 and expects to race it?
These cars arnt all about the 1320, its about the drive.
My 3.4 car got between 17 and 26. Granted a 4th gen V8 will do similar, the 3.4 is by no means a "bad" motor. Most have tons of miles and are not taken care of.
I'm just saying, for the price of a lower mileage 3.4 vs. that of a comparable 3.8, I'd go with the 3.8.Nick H.
Current MIFC Vice President
sigpic
Comment

If shes that concerned about gas mileage.then get a focus 


Comment