Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

383 Stroker giving shorter lifespan?

Collapse
X
Collapse
Who has read this thread:
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 383 Stroker giving shorter lifespan?

    When converting an LT1 350 into a 383 stroker, I have a slight concern. When increasing the stroke, and increasing the rod length or not, the pressure on the cylinder walls increases (or so I have concluded based on some articles I've read). This is said to cause stress on piston rings etc. My question is this: does converting to a 383 stroker shorten the lifespan of the engine? If so, is it a noticeable decrease? I'm sure this depends on the parts changed during the conversion. If it does, what parts would give a smaller decrease? Thanks!
    1995 Trans Am Firebird. LT1 with 6 Speed manual. cc503 Cam. Pacesetter long tubes with true dual exhaust. LPE CAI. K&N. 4.10 Gears. ZR1 Replica Rims. Comp Cams 1.6 Roller Rockers. Double roller timing chain. BMR Sub Frame connectors. LT4 Knock Mod. Madz28 tune. Pro 5.0 shifter. LS1 Driveshaft. MSD Coil. Sequential Taillights. Custom Interior. Lead foot.
    CarDomain
    Time Slip: 1/4 -- 12.49 @ 116 MPH

  • #2
    With and increased stroke you will place more force on the thrust side of the cylinder wall. Don't really know if it's a BIG concern though when it comes to longevity of the motor. Performance motors in general do not have the long lifespan of a factory type motor.
    sigpic
    Turbo Charged LS1/T56

    Comment


    • #3
      Those are my thoughts exactly, James. I would think any time you do a performance mod the longevity of the engine goes down.
      - Brian Meissen
      Owner, MiFBody.com
      Administrator, LTxTech.com


      1994 Camaro LT1 Transplant - 357ci LT1, cammed, stalled, and driven.
      2022 Camaro LT1 - "Cherry Bomb 2"
      Michigan FBody Meet & Greet Car Show 2022
      June 4th, 2022 - 9am to 3pm!!!
      The HUB Stadium, Auburn Hills, MI

      Comment


      • #4
        I'll go with the other side of the argument and say it would not be noticable, and more dependant on regular maintenance and driving habits (i.e. is every mile put on the car measured a quarter mile at a time?).

        A 383 is just a 350 block with a 400 crank, both proven performers. Yes, the cylinder cross-sectional area is smaller in a 383 vs a 400 and thus will see incremental higher pressures than a stock 350, but cylinder wall thickness is greater in a 383 than a 400 to compensate for it.

        Good components (including head bolts and gaskets), good lubricants, regualar maintenance, and there should not be a noticable difference.
        Originally posted by Redd8407
        I WANT NOISE! SPEED! AN ENGINE THAT SHAKES MY INTERNAL ORGANS LIKE THEY GOT PARKINSON'S! I DONT WANT AN ENGINE THAT IS PARTIALLY POWERED BY MY LAPTOP BATTERY!
        Originally posted by Z28ISGR8
        WHY THE F*CK IS THERE A GOAT ON A FERRARI?
        Originally posted by Darren
        I think it is because I take it in and out all the time, the rubber has just stretched out, especially at the bottom where it is really thin. It annoys me more then anything.

        Comment


        • #5
          the longevity does go down (you may only get 150k insted of 250k) it's still going to give a long life if taken care of

          Comment

          Working...
          X