best way to tell on any GM is to check the RPO codes. Someone listed them in this thread. Should be the same for all GMs Eric L
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stock rearend
Collapse
X
-

1997 Camaro SS #2819 M6, Red, 3.42, 1 of 27, Ttops, BBK shorty headers, Flowmaster cat back, 1.6 rr, LT4 valve springs, ASAM CAI, Centerforce clutch, runs 12s, breaks 10 bolts.
http://s602.photobucket.com/albums/t...20Camaro%20SS/

1963 Plymouth Valiant Signet 200, 6.0 LS3, Carb, Rapid Motorsports Dominator 2X cam.
http://s602.photobucket.com/albums/t...uth%20Valiant/
-
In my opinion, skip shift was a pain in the butt, driving in normal traffic.In that you could not accelerate hard because the guy in front of you wasn't. So now your forced to use less than 15% throttle and good ole skip shift blocks second gear, and like you said, forced you to shove it into third. Which really bugged me! Fourth gear in this condition would lug the car. I think the bigger ratio will give you more acceleration,for the given throttle position. I also think that the 3.42 rearend wasn't really big enough. But was designed to satisfy EPA requirements. Also what I wanted to do was give me better acceleration for throttle position and not defeat the overdrive. Where as I feel a 4.10 rearend would effect highway mileage. That's why I elected to put a 3.73 rearend in my Camaro. Just my two cents!!Originally posted by 1fstss View Postwhy would you go 3.73 in a 6 speed car? sounds like a waste of time... and skip shift isnt that bad
when your accelerating hard it doesnt turn on, but driving around town i shift 1-3-5-6 anyway 
RickNever complain,Never explain.
Member Eastern Michigan Camaro Club
Comment
Comment